Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Bald Head
Beard Transplant
Burn Victim
Celebrity Hair Transplants
Dermatologic Surgery
Dr. Jonathan Huber
Dr. Robert Jones
hair loss
Hair Loss Products
hair transplant
Instant hair
Scar Repair
Social Media
Sun Damage
Tell Your Story

Our Blog

The hair transplantation field is continuously evolving with various new technologies, techniques and procedures that can be applied for hair transplants. In this interesting discussion, we have compared our Dr Huber and Dr Jones’ FUE technique with the ARTAS FUE robotic hair transplantation technique.

ARTAS vs. THTC’s FUE Technique – An interesting comparison

The hair transplantation field is continuously evolving, with various new technologies, techniques and procedures that can be applied for hair transplants. In this interesting discussion, we have compared the FUE technique both our doctors use with the ARTAS FUE robotic hair transplantation technique. FUE is one of the newer hair transplant procedures wherein hair follicles are removed from the donor’s scalp and harvested in the scalp areas where hair growth has stopped or where hair loss is significant. The ARTAS FUE robotic hair transplantation technique is an advanced and evolved version of the FUE procedure, which is meant to provide equal accuracy (as compared to a surgeon) while the grafts are being harvested during the transplantation process.

ARTAS System History

Restoration Robotics is a company founded by Dr. Frederick H. Moll, who developed the ARTAS System. This completely automated machine is the first robot designed to carry out the scoring aspect of the FUE hair transplant procedure.

ARTAS System: The Mechanism Explained

The robotic arm of ARTAS consists of cameras, colour identification sensors and 3-D imaging software that guide the robotic arm in selecting the follicles that need to be scored. ARTAS consists of the following components that have been designed to carry out the FUE process:

  • A needle punch mechanism
  • Disposable dermal punches
  • Disposable cartridges
  • A video imaging system
  • A user interface

The Transplant Procedure

The patient is positioned for the robot to punch out the grafts on a donor area of roughly 5 to 10 cm at a time. During this time, the patient must remain absolutely still as the head is restrained by straps. After this, the surgeon removes each graft by hand with a pair of forceps. The patient is then repositioned for ARTAS to work on a new section of donor hair. This process continues until the extraction portion of surgery is complete. The implantation of grafts to the bald area is done using a traditional transplant approach.

Pros and Cons of ARTAS

Pros of ARTAS

  • The speed of the extraction process is significantly improved with the procedure over inexperienced and untrained surgeons. This allows for providers who do not have a lot of experience doing the FUE procedure manually to offer the service.

Cons of ARTAS in comparison with the Toronto Hair Transplant Centre’s FUE Technique

  • ARTAS tries to replicate the touch of a human expert to the procedure.
  • ARTAS charges for all the grafts, including those used and destroyed during the procedure, whereas Dr Huber and Dr Jones only plant and charges for viable grafts.
  • Dr Huber and Dr Jones extract more grafts per hour, compared to the robot (= the transection rate is higher).
  • The robot has limitations in the perfect selection of grafts as compared to Dr Huber or Dr Jones, who can pick and choose varying size grafts, depending on the patient’s needs.
  • The ARTAS system requires the patient to shave his or her head prior to the procedure, while Dr Huber and Dr Jones can perform the FUE Procedure with partial and sometimes no shaving of the head.

At this point, both Dr Huber and Dr Jones feel the only advantage of the ARTAS Robot for an experienced FUE surgeon is a marketing one. It is slower, with higher transection rate, more expensive and less choice when choosing the areas to extract grafts from for the patient.

** Blog post originally posted August 23, 2019 – Updated June 9, 2020.

Dr. Jonathan Huber

Dr. Huber completed his training in medical and surgical hair restoration under the direct guidance of Dr. Robert Jones, one of the world’s most influential, experienced, and trusted hair restoration surgeons.

It was Dr. Jones who pioneered large session FUE and Dr. Huber has uniquely benefitted from Dr. Jones’ direct, one-on-one mentorship by learning the exact same techniques and utilizing the same highly experienced, expertly qualified staff.

To know more about Dr. Jonathan Huber - Click Here

You may follow Dr. Huber on Facebook: Dr. Jonathan Huber and on Instagram: @Dr. Huber

Related posts:


Real Patients, Real Reviews

Hair Transplant Patient

“Helped me through a process that I thought would be difficult, but it was easy! I am so happy with how I look now and have so much more confidence approaching women now. Thank you so much.”

– Spencer Strong

Hair Transplant Patient

“Was awesome! Everything was great, the staff, the office and it all went like he said it would. Best of all is the finished product. It looks so natural and I look 10 years younger! So glad I went.”

– Hair Transplant Patient

FUE Hair Transplant

“Has provided me with a new lease on life. I only had about 1500 grafts but the results have been dramatic and I’m very happy with my surgery. I underwent the no shave fue option earlier this year…”

– Bcan86A