The hair transplantation field is continuously evolving with various new technologies, techniques and procedures that can be applied for hair transplants. In this interesting discussion, we have compared Dr. Jones’ FUE Technique with the ARTAS FUE robotic hair transplantation technique.
ARTAS vs. Dr. Jones’s FUE Technique – An interesting comparison
The hair transplantation field is continuously evolving, with various new technologies, techniques and procedures that can be applied for hair transplants. In this interesting discussion, we have compared Dr. Jones’ FUE technique with the ARTAS FUE robotic hair transplantation technique. FUE is one of the newest hair transplant procedures wherein hair follicles are removed from the donor’s scalp and harvested in the scalp areas where hair growth has stopped or where hair loss is significant. The ARTAS FUE robotic hair transplantation technique is an advanced and evolved version of the FUE procedure, which provides a lot more accuracy while the grafts are being harvested during the transplantation process.
ARTAS System History
Restoration Robotics is a company founded by Dr. Frederick H. Moll, who developed the ARTAS System. This completely automated machine is the first robot designed to carry out the scoring aspect of the FUE hair transplant procedure.
ARTAS System: The Mechanism Explained
The robotic arm of ARTAS consists of cameras, colour identification sensors and 3-D imaging software that guide the robotic arm in selecting the follicles that need to be scored. ARTAS consists of the following components that have been designed to carry out the FUE process:
- A needle punch mechanism
- Disposable dermal punches
- Disposable cartridges
- A video imaging system
- A user interface
The Transplant Procedure
The patient is positioned for the robot to punch out the grafts on a donor area of roughly 5 to 10 cm at a time. During this time, the patient must remain absolutely still as the head is restrained by straps. After this, the surgeon removes each graft by hand with a pair of forceps. The patient is then repositioned for ARTAS to work on a new section of donor hair. This process continues until the extraction portion of surgery is complete. The implantation of grafts to the bald area is done using a traditional transplant approach.
Pros and Cons of ARTAS
Pros of ARTAS
- ARTAS tries to replicate the touch of a human expert to the procedure.
- The speed of the extraction process is significantly improved with the procedure.
- The procedure is a blessing for providers who do not have a lot of experience doing the FUE procedure manually.
Cons of ARTAS in comparison with Dr. Jones’ FUE Technique
- Transection rate is higher. ARTAS charges for all the grafts, including those used and destroyed during the procedure, whereas Dr. Jones only plants and charges for viable grafts.
- Dr. Jones extracts more grafts per hour, compared to the robot.
- The robot has limitations in the perfect selection of grafts as compared to Dr. Jones, who can pick and choose varying size grafts, depending on the patient’s needs.
- The ARTAS system requires the patient to shave his or her head prior to the procedure, while Dr. Jones can perform the FUE Procedure without any need to shave the head.
At this point, Dr. Jones feels the only advantage of the ARTAS Robot for an experienced FUE surgeon is a marketing one. It is slower, with higher transection rate, more expensive and less choice when choosing the areas to extract grafts from for the patient.