callFOR CONSULTATION
877-789-4247
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Bald Head
Beard Transplant
Botox
Burn Victim
CBD
Celebrity Hair Transplants
Crown
Dermatologic Surgery
DHT
Dr. Jonathan Huber
Dr. Robert Jones
drugs
Eyebrow
FUE
FUT
Grafts
hair loss
Hair Loss Products
hair transplant
Infographic
Instant hair
News
Propecia
PRP
Scar Repair
Social Media
Strip-surgery
Sun Damage
Tell Your Story
Toronto

Our Blog

ARTAS Hair Transplant Robot vs. THTC’s FUE Technique

Restoration Robotics, a company founded by Dr Frederick H. Moll, developed the ARTAS System. This completely automated machine is the first robot designed to carry out the scoring aspect of the FUE hair transplant procedure.

HOW ARTAS WORKS: THE MECHANICS

Cameras, colour identification sensors, and 3-D imaging software guide the robotic arm of ARTAS in selecting which follicles to score. To carry out the rest of the FUE process, ARTAS employs a needle punch mechanism, disposable dermal punches, disposable cartridges, a video imaging system and a user interface.

The patient is positioned for the robot to punch out the grafts on a donor area of roughly 5 to 10 cm at a time. During this time, the patient must remain absolutely still, and the head is restrained by straps. After this, the surgeon removes each graft by hand with a pair of forceps. The patient is then repositioned for ARTAS to work on a new section of donor hair. This process continues until the extraction portion of the surgery is complete. The implantation of grafts to the bald area is done using a traditional transplant approach.

POTENTIAL PROS OF ARTAS

The thought of a machine extracting FUE grafts is an attractive one if the machine can replicate the touch of an expert human practitioner, and if it can boost the speed of the extraction process.

In the opinion of both our skilled and experienced surgeons, this robot may work for doctors who wish to provide FUE, but don’t have the experience to do it manually or with a power punch.

CONS OF ARTAS OVER THTC’s FUE TECHNIQUE

  • Higher Transection Rate. The Artas Robot has a transection rate (destroyed grafts) of 8 to 10%. Both Dr Huber and Dr Jones’ transection rate is 3 to 5%. Artas charges the doctor for all the destroyed grafts as well as the viable grafts, so many doctors plant these destroyed grafts knowing they won’t grow. Dr Huber and Dr Jones know the difference and with medical integrity – only charge for and plant viable grafts.
  • Slower Rate of Extraction. The robot currently extracts about 600 grafts per hour, whereas both our doctors – Dr Huber and Dr Jones can extract 1,500 to 2,000 grafts per hour, enabling them to do 3,000 and even 4,000-graft sessions in a single day.
  • Larger Punch. The Artas system uses a punch with a diameter of 1.65 mm, and our doctors use punches from .7 to .9 mm. A smaller punch means faster healing of the donor area, and there is less likely to be damage to surrounding grafts.
  • More Likelihood of Buried Grafts. The Artas robot uses a dull punch system, which has been shown to be more likely to bury some of the grafts and cause cyst formation.
  • A Robot Cannot Select Grafts for an Individual Patient. Any automated device will still have limitations in discerning the best follicle for extraction. For example, it is important to select donor hairs with a specific hairline or eyebrow design in mind. It is difficult for a machine to do this, whereas Dr Huber or Dr Jones can pick and choose different size grafts depending on the patient’s needs.
  • Limited Donor Site. The Artas System is limited to areas that the square device can fit on (i.e. a strip around the back of the head). Dr’s Huber and Jones are able to extract from all permanent areas, including the sideburns, the beard or any other area of the body they choose.
  • The Need to Shave the Head. With the Artas System, the physician has to shave the patient’s head, where Dr Huber and Dr Jones can perform an FUE procedure with limited or in some cases no shaving.
  • Limited Hair Characteristics. ARTAS is only approved for use on patients with straight hair that is dark brown or black in colour. Our team of Doctors can perform FUE on any hair colour or texture.

At this point, both Dr Huber and Dr Jones feel the only advantage of the Artas Robot over an experienced FUE surgeon is purely a marketing one. It is slower, has a higher transection rate, is more expensive and has fewer choice of areas from which the grafts can be extracted.

*Original blog post dated August 21, 2019 – updated June 9, 2020.

Dr. Jonathan Huber

Dr. Huber completed his training in medical and surgical hair restoration under the direct guidance of Dr. Robert Jones, one of the world’s most influential, experienced, and trusted hair restoration surgeons.

It was Dr. Jones who pioneered large session FUE and Dr. Huber has uniquely benefitted from Dr. Jones’ direct, one-on-one mentorship by learning the exact same techniques and utilizing the same highly experienced, expertly qualified staff.

To know more about Dr. Jonathan Huber - Click Here

You may follow Dr. Huber on Facebook: Dr. Jonathan Huber and on Instagram: @Dr. Huber

Related posts:

Testimonials

Real Patients, Real Reviews

5-stars-testi
Hair Transplant Patient
Google-Reviews

“Helped me through a process that I thought would be difficult, but it was easy! I am so happy with how I look now and have so much more confidence approaching women now. Thank you so much.”

– Spencer Strong

5-stars-testi
Hair Transplant Patient

“Was awesome! Everything was great, the staff, the office and it all went like he said it would. Best of all is the finished product. It looks so natural and I look 10 years younger! So glad I went.”

– Hair Transplant Patient

5-stars-testi
FUE Hair Transplant

“Has provided me with a new lease on life. I only had about 1500 grafts but the results have been dramatic and I’m very happy with my surgery. I underwent the no shave fue option earlier this year…”

– Bcan86A